正学习提摩太前书中关于男人和女人的差别一段 (1 Tim 2)。
老师说,当今美国总统在接见一个宣称自己是同性恋的美式橄榄球运动员时笑容满面热情洋溢地说,“congratulation!”
这个国家的现状就是如此了,成为同性恋是一件值得时尚的事情。而勇敢地承认自己是同性恋者,总统就会恭喜你,因为你是民族英雄!如果你用facebook,恭喜你,现在可以自由选择50种性别中的一种了。请前往观摩。
但是,作为一个曾经在瑞典宣教的宣教士,Dr. Miller给我们讲述了另一个让人吃惊的事情:瑞典不仅要让男女平等,而且要让男女中性化。看得懂英语的人请自己看。
××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××
Source: http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2012/04/hen_sweden_s_new_gender_neutral_pronoun_causes_controversy_.html
Sweden’s New Gender-Neutral Pronoun: Hen
瑞典的新代词:Hen
A country tries to banish gender. 一个要消灭性别的国家。
By most people’s standards, Sweden is a paradise for liberated women. It has the highest proportion of working women in the world, and women earn about two-thirds of all degrees. Standard parental leave runs at 480 days, and 60 of those days are reserved exclusively for dads, causing some to credit the country with forging the way for a new kind of [nurturing masculinity](http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/doublex/2010/08/snack_bags_and_a_regular_paycheck_the_happy_life_of_a_swedish_dad.html). In 2010, the World Economic Forum designated Sweden as the most gender-equal country in the world. 在所有人看来,瑞典是女人解放的天堂。这里有世界上最高的女人就业率,2/3的学位由女人获得。标准的产假是480天,其中60天是单独为爸爸预备的。。。。。2010年,世界经济论坛说瑞典是世界上男女最平等的国家。
But for many Swedes, gender equality is not enough. Many are pushing for the Nordic nation to be not simply gender-*equal* but gender-*neutral*. The idea is that the government and society should tolerate no distinctions at all between the sexes. This means on the narrow level that society should show sensitivity to people who don’t identify themselves as either male or female, including allowing any type of couple to marry. But that’s the least radical part of the project. What many gender-neutral activists are after is a society that entirely erases traditional gender roles and stereotypes at even the most mundane levels. 但是对很多瑞典人来说,性别平等还不够。很多人推动这个北欧国家不仅实现性别平等(gender-*equal*),而且应该性别中立(gender-*neutral*)。其要点是政府和社会应该对任何性别差异零容忍。。。。。。
Activists are lobbying for parents to be able to choose any name for their children (there are currently just 170 legally recognized unisex names in Sweden). [The idea is](http://www.spraktidningen.se/artiklar/2008/08/konsneutrala-fornamn-kan-gynna-mannen) that names should not be at all tied to gender, so it would be acceptable for parents to, say, name a girl Jack or a boy Lisa. A Swedish children’s clothes company has removed the “boys” and “girls” sections in its stores, and the idea of dressing children in a gender-neutral manner has been widely [discussed](http://femforaldrar.blogspot.com/) on parenting blogs. This [Swedish toy catalog](http://www.thelocal.se/39988/) recently decided to switch things around, showing a boy in a Spider-Man costume pushing a pink pram, while a girl in denim rides a yellow tractor. (名字可以随便取,跟性别无关)
The Swedish Bowling Association has announced [plans](http://mvt.se/sport/ovriga/bowling/1.1369346-bowlingen-kan-bli-konsneutral) to merge male and female bowling tournaments in order to make the sport gender-neutral. Social Democrat politicians have [proposed](http://www.dn.se/debatt/stockholmsdebatt/infor-konsneutrala-toaletter-och-kommunala-hbt-boenden-for-aldre-) installing gender-neutral restrooms so that members of the public will not be compelled to categorize themselves as either ladies or gents. Several preschools have banished references to pupils’ genders, instead referring to children by their first names or as “buddies.” So, a teacher would say “good morning, buddies” or “good morning, Lisa, Tom, and Jack” rather than, “good morning, boys and girls.” They believe this fulfills the national curriculum’s guideline that preschools should “counteract traditional gender patterns and gender roles” and give girls and boys “the same opportunities to test and develop abilities and interests without being limited by stereotypical gender roles.” (保龄球运动男女混搭,性别中立)。老师应该说,孩子们,早上好。或者说Lisa,Tom,jack 早上好。但是不能说,男孩们女孩们早上好(good morning, boys and girls).
Earlier this month, the movement for gender neutrality reached a milestone: Just days after International Women’s Day a new pronoun, *hen* (pronounced like the bird in English), was added to the online version of the country’s *National Encyclopedia*. The [entry](http://www.ne.se/hen/1826342) defines *hen* as a “proposed gender-neutral personal pronoun instead of he \[*han* in Swedish\] and she \[*hon*\].”The *National Encyclopedia* announcement came amid a heated debate about gender neutrality that has been raging in Swedish newspaper columns and TV studios and on parenting blogs and feminist websites. It was sparked by the publication of Sweden’s first ever gender-neutral children’s book, [*Kivi och Monsterhund*](http://www.olika.nu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=412&Itemid=206) (Kivi and Monsterdog). It tells the story of Kivi, who wants a dog for “hen’s” birthday. The male author, Jesper Lundqvist, introduces several gender-neutral words in the book. For instance the words *mammor* and *pappor* (moms and dads) are replaced with *mappor* and *pammor*.
The free lifestyle magazine, [*Nöjesguiden*](http://www.nojesguiden.se/), which is distributed in major Swedish cities and is similar to the *Village Voice*, recently released an issue using *hen* throughout. In his column, writer Kawa Zolfagari says, “It can be hard to handle the male ego sometimes. I myself tend to get a stinging feeling when a female friend has had it with sexism or has got hurt because of some guy and desperately blurts out some generalisation about men. Sometimes I think ‘Hen knows me, hen knows I am not an idiot, why does hen speak that way of all men?’ *Nöjesguiden*‘s editor, Margret Atladottir, said *hen* ought to be included in the dictionary of the Swedish Academy, the body that awards the Nobel Prize in literature.
Hen was first mentioned by Swedish linguists in the mid-1960s, and then in 1994 the late linguist Hans Karlgren suggested adding *hen* as a new personal pronoun, mostly for practical reasons. Karlgren was trying to avoid the awkward he/she that gums up writing, and invent a single word “that enables us to speak of a person without specifying their gender. He argued that it could improve the Swedish language and make it more nuanced.
Today’s *hen* champions, however, have a distinctly political agenda. For instance, Lundqvist’s book is published by a house named Olika, which means “different or diverse.” Olika only publishes books that “challenge stereotypes and obsolete norms and traditions in the world of literature.” Its titles include [100 möjligheter Istället *för 2!*](http://www.olika.nu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=121&Itemid=91) (“100 possibilities instead of 2!”), a book for adults who “want to give children more opportunities in gender-stereotyped everyday life”; and [*Det var en g*å*ng … en ritbok!*](http://www.olika.nu/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=173&Itemid=127) (“Once upon a time there was … a drawing book!”), the first “gender-scrutinizing” drawing book for children that “challenges traditional and dminshing conceptions of girls and boys, men and women.”
But not everyone is keen on this political meddling with the Swedish language. In a recent [interview](http://www.vice.com/read/what-do-swedes-think-of-their-new-language-pronoun) for *Vice* magazine, Jan Guillou, one of Sweden’s most well-known authors, referred to proponents of *hen* as “feminist activists who want to destroy our language.” Other critics believe it can be psychologically and socially damaging, especially for children. Elise Claeson, a columnist and a former equality expert at the Swedish Confederation of Professions, has said that young children can become confused by the suggestion that there is a third, “in-between” gender at a time when their brains and bodies are developing. Adults should not interrupt children’s discovery of their gender and sexuality, argues Claeson. She [told](http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/kritiker-hen-gor-barn-forvirrade) the Swedish daily, *Dagens Nyheter*, that “gender ideologues” have managed to change the curriculum to establish that schools should actively counter gender roles.
Claeson might have a point. The Swedish school system has wholeheartedly, and probably too quickly and eagerly, embraced this new agenda. Last fall, 200 teachers attended a major government-sponsored [conference](http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/sa-ska-skolan-bli-konsneutral) discussing how to avoid “traditional gender patterns” in schools. At [Egalia](http://www.sodermalmsforskolor.se/egalia/extern/start.php), one model Stockholm preschool, everything from the decoration to the books and toys are carefully selected to promote a gender-equal perspective and to avoid traditional presentations of gender and parenting roles. The teachers try to expose the pupils to as few “gendered expressions” as possible. At Christmastime, the Egalia staff rewrote a traditional song as “*hen* bakes cakes all day long.” When pupils play house, they are encouraged to include “mommy, daddy, child” in their imaginary families, as well as “daddy, daddy, child”; “mommy, mommy, child”; “daddy, daddy, sister, aunty, child”; or any other modern combination.
To those who feel gender equality or gender neutrality ought to be intrinsic to a modern society, it probably makes sense to argue for instilling such values at an early age. The Green Party has even suggested placing “gender pedagogues” in every preschool in Stockholm, the Swedish capital, who can act as watchdogs. But of course toddlers cannot weigh arguments for and against linguistic interventions and they do not conceive of or analyze gender roles in the way that adults do.
Ironically, in the effort to free Swedish children from so-called normative behavior, gender-neutral proponents are also subjecting them to a whole set of *new* rules and *new* norms as certain forms of play become taboo, language becomes regulated, and children’s interactions and attitudes are closely observed by teachers. One Swedish school [got rid](http://tanjabergkvist.wordpress.com/tag/konskodade-leksaker/) of its toy cars because boys “gender-coded” them and ascribed the cars higher status than other toys. Another preschool removed “free playtime” from its schedule because, as a pedagogue at the school [put it](http://www.svd.se/nyheter/idagsidan/barn-och-unga/den-fria-leken-ar-nastan-fanigt-hyllad_6163559.svd), when children play freely “stereotypical gender patterns are born and cemented. In free play there is hierarchy, exclusion, and the seed to bullying.” And so every detail of children’s interactions gets micromanaged by concerned adults, who end up problematizing minute aspects of children’s lives, from how they form friendships to what games they play and what songs they sing.
*[Nathalie Rothschild](http://www.nathalierothschild.com/) is a freelance journalist.*